Controllers
package com.arcrobotics.ftclib.controller
Last updated
package com.arcrobotics.ftclib.controller
Last updated
In FTCLib, there are controllers that can improve the motion of mechanisms in FTC. This includes PID control and feedforward control. For information on the theory behind PID control, we recommend reading this page in gm0.
The following post from Noah in the FTC Discord best explains PID control.
You'll hear the term PID Controller used a lot (F is tacked on sometimes) in robotics. It's relatively simple and pretty effective at a lot of simple tasks. A PID controller is a form of "closed loop control." This basically just means you're altering an input to some "plant" based on feedback. This concept applies to a wide range of actions but we'll take a look at velocity PID control as that is what's relevant for this year's game. So say you have a goBILDA 3:1 1620RPM motor powering a flywheel. You want that flywheel to spin at a constant speed to ensure consistency between your shots. So you run a
motor.setPower(0.5)
which sends 50% of 12v to the motor. The motor is getting a 6v signal (technically not true bc of PWM but that's another topic). The motor should be running at 810 RPM right? That's 50% of 1620RPM. Chances are, it's not actually running at this speed. Motors have +- 10% tolerance between them. The voltage-torque curve isn't linear. Or there is something resisting the motor (like the inertia of the flywheel) so it takes extra power to get it up to that speed. So how do we actually ensure that our motor is running at exactly 810RPM? Most FTC motors come with an encoder built it. This allows us to measure the velocity of the output shaft. So with the encoder all hooked up, we know that our motor isn't spinning as fast as we want it to. But how do we actually correct for this? You slap a PID Controller on it. A PID controller is a pretty basic controller (despite the daunting equation when you look it up) that basically responds to your the difference between your measured velocity and desired velocity (error) and will add more or less power based on error. You just check the velocity every loop, feed the value in the controlled, and it gives you the power you want to set it to the desired velocity.
The following video does a good job explaining each gain:
Our base class is PIDFController
for the FTCLib PID control scheme. This class performs the calculations for PIDF, which are proportional, integral, derivative, and feedforward values. The additional F term is an additional gain for creating offset, for purposes like maintaining a position, counteracting weight/gravity, or overcoming friction.
In order to use FTCLib's PIDF control functionality, users must first construct a PIDFController
object with the desired gains:
You can also pass in an additional two parameters: the setpoint and previous value. The default values for these are 0.
You can also change the gain constants even after creating the controller object.
These gains must be tuned. An example of tuning PID can be found on this page of Learn Road Runner.
The calculate()
method should be called each iteration of the control loop. The controller uses timestamps to calculate the difference in time between each call of the method, which means it adjusts based on the loop time. You can obtain the cycle time of your current loop iteration by calling getPeriod()
.
Using the constructed PIDFController
is simple: call the calculate()
method from the main loop.
The methods getPositionError()
and getVelocityError()
are named assuming that the loop is controlling a position - for a loop that is controlling a velocity, these return the velocity error and the acceleration error, respectively.
The current error of the measured process variable is returned by the getPositionError()
function, while its derivative is returned by the getVelocityError()
function.
If only a position tolerance is specified, the velocity tolerance defaults to infinity.
As above, “position” refers to the process variable measurement, and “velocity” to its derivative - thus, for a velocity loop, these are actually velocity and acceleration, respectively.
Occasionally, it is useful to know if a controller has tracked the setpoint to within a given tolerance - for example, to determine if a command should be ended, or (while following a motion profile) if motion is being impeded and needs to be re-planned.
To do this, we first must specify the tolerances with the setTolerance()
method; then, we can check it with the atSetPoint()
method.
It is sometimes desirable to clear the internal state (most importantly, the integral accumulator) of a PIDFController
, as it may be no longer valid (e.g. when the PIDFController
has been disabled and then re-enabled). This can be accomplished by calling the reset()
method.
So far, we’ve used feedback control for reference tracking (making a system’s output follow a desired reference signal). While this is effective, it’s a reactionary measure; the system won’t start applying control effort until the system is already behind. If we could tell the controller about the desired movement and required input beforehand, the system could react quicker and the feedback controller could do less work. A controller that feeds information forward into the plant like this is called a feedforward controller.
A feedforward controller injects information about the system’s dynamics (like a mathematical model does) or the intended movement. Feedforward handles parts of the control actions we already know must be applied to make a system track a reference, then feedback compensates for what we do not or cannot know about the system’s behavior at runtime.
There are two types of feedforwards: model-based feedforward and feedforward for unmodeled dynamics. The first solves a mathematical model of the system for the inputs required to meet desired velocities and accelerations. The second compensates for unmodeled forces or behaviors directly so the feedback controller doesn’t have to. Both types can facilitate simpler feedback controllers. We’ll cover several examples below.
FTCLib provides a number of classes to help users implement accurate feedforward control for their mechanisms. In many ways, an accurate feedforward is more important than feedback to effective control of a mechanism. Since most FTC mechanisms closely obey well-understood system equations, starting with an accurate feedforward is both easy and hugely beneficial to accurate and robust mechanism control.
FTCLib currently provides the following three helper classes for feedforward control. The feedforward components will calculate outputs in units determined by the units of the user-provided feedforward gains. Users must take care to keep units consistent as it does not have a type-safe unit system.
The SimpleMotorFeedforward
class calculates feedforwards for mechanisms that consist of permanent-magnet DC motors with no external loading other than friction and inertia, such as flywheels and robot drives.
To create a SimpleMotorFeedforward
, simply construct it with the required gains:
Please note that the kA
value is optional. If the mechanism does not have much inertia, then it is not required.
To calculate the feedforward, simply call the calculate()
method with the desired motor velocity and acceleration:
The ArmFeedforward
class calculates feedforwards for arms that are controlled directly by a permanent-magnet DC motor, with external loading of friction, inertia, and mass of the arm. This is an accurate model of most arms in FTC.
To create an ArmFeedforward
, simply construct it with the required gains:
To calculate the feedforward, simply call the calculate()
method with the desired arm position, velocity, and acceleration:
The ElevatorFeedforward
class calculates feedforwards for elevators that consist of permanent-magnet DC motors loaded by friction, inertia, and the mass of the elevator. This is an accurate model of most elevators in FTC.
To create a ElevatorFeedforward
, simply construct it with the required gains:
To calculate the feedforward, simply call the calculate()
method with the desired motor velocity and acceleration:
Feedforward control can be used entirely on its own, without a feedback controller. This is known as “open-loop” control, and for many mechanisms (especially robot drives) can be perfectly satisfactory. A SimpleMotorFeedforward
might be employed to control a robot drive as follows: